To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63015
------- Additional comments from bengtahlg...@openoffice.org Thu Mar 11 20:26:09 +0000 2010 ------- I have this problem too for a font that I just bought (Helvetica Neue LT, windows postscript version). There is no problem with e.g., Nimbus Sans. Is more information needed to solve the issue? Looking at the PDF file, there is a difference in how Nimbus Sans and Helvetica Neue are embedded. For the first, the umlauted characters are embedded separately in addition to the complete set. The separate embedding looks like this: 54 0 obj <</Type/Encoding/Differences[ 0 /Udieresis /Aring /Adieresis /Odieresis /aring /adieresis /odieresis]>> endobj [...] 56 0 obj <</Type/Font/Subtype/Type1/BaseFont/NimbusSanL-Regu /Encoding 54 0 R /ToUnicode 55 0 R /FirstChar 0 /LastChar 6 /Widths[722 667 667 778 556 556 556 ] /FontDescriptor 51 0 R>> endobj There is no such handling of the umlauted characters for Helvetica Neue. Comparing the .afm files, Nimbus Sans has, for example: C -1 ; WX 556 ; N aring ; B 42 -23 535 754 ; and Helvetica Neue has: C 229 ; WX 574 ; N aring ; B -7 -14 522 778 ; If you need more info, I'd be happy to provide! --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
