To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110129
------- Additional comments from pulsi...@openoffice.org Mon Mar 15 14:52:19 +0000 2010 ------- >> "As long as configmgr has a private C++ interface, it cannot be replaced >> by another UNO component." > I assume this is only of theoretical interest, right? This is not a theoretical interest. We would use this mechanism to implement our our custom configuration layer, the one we have been using with OOo since v2.0. (The oor:external mechanism you added to the new configmgr is not sufficient for our purposes.) This would be simple change in the new configmgr, and would bring it back on par with the configmgr that has been in OOo since v1.1.0, which was an UNO component with a pure UNO interface. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
