To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110427
------- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Mar 29 08:24:48 +0000 2010 ------- > Hmm - is it possible that you added those fixes after the 1.0 release? We just > copied over the 1.0 release version. But since SVN screw up the thing during a > rebase attempt, it might well be possible we missed something there. i did them when I did them. As you can't properly sync extension released with code, yes, I might have committed it after the release- > Re-closing as INVALID. Nearly all of the stuff you claimed in the original > description is bogus, If you add mysqlc to OOO320 silently and loose important stuff, I should be wary, shouldn't I? You should have told people that you did this... > including the "extension identifier" thing, as explained above. True. That might be my error. > If you need a build issue to be fix, submit a usual build breaker issue, > please. as you wish. Issue --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
