To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111685
User ccheney changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Status|CLOSED |UNCONFIRMED -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|FIXED | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from cche...@openoffice.org Sun May 30 04:25:07 +0000 2010 ------- Am I wrong here or isn't the fact that you have to turn on 'nobrl' to make OOo work with cifs still a bug in OOo. What 'nobrl' does is the following: nobrl Do not send byte range lock requests to the server. This is necessary for certain applications that break with cifs style mandatory byte range locks (and most cifs servers do not yet support requesting advisory byte range locks). This is now worked around by ooo-build but as far as I know this wouldn't this still affect the official version? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org