To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6401
------- Additional comments from nebbi...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 23 16:22:09
+0000 2010 -------
> Not really, IMHO.
> Implementing this one would make the other one obsolete.
> But implementing the RFE in issue 104734
> wouldn't solve this one completely.
@mba
@hughg
I apologize. I have confused.
This Issue is to solve a problem with alphabetical indexes.
The issue 104734, instead on "user-defined" (they are more similar to TOC)
Not address the problems of compatibility with MS Word
MS field codes (Index entry)
{ XE "Index 1" \f "b" }
{ XE "Index 2" \f "c" }
MS field codes (TOC)
{ TC "User-defined 1" \f C \l "1" }
{ TC "User-defined 2" \f D \l "1" }
I apologize again.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
