To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47893
User mba changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Assigned to|fl |tl -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target milestone|OOo Later |OOo 3.x -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 30 10:31:28 +0000 2010 ------- It seems that there is no contradiction. The only question that remains is: should we keep the name "default formatting"? IMHO we can keep it, as "default" never was an exact or strict definition for what was happening. And we all seemed to agree that the old behavior was just wrong, the new one would be what is *expected* as a default behavior. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org