To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112761
------- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 30 15:00:01 +0000
2010 -------
@rene: I would still prefer patch
---8<---
diff -r fad23fb34ff7 configure.in
--- a/configure.in Thu Jun 17 14:29:52 2010 +0200
+++ b/configure.in Wed Jun 30 17:03:37 2010 +0200
@@ -3387,15 +3387,16 @@
fi
fi
AC_SUBST(BUILD_EPM)
- AC_SUBST(PKGFORMAT)
AC_SUBST(RPM)
AC_SUBST(DPKG)
AC_SUBST(PKGMK)
else
AC_MSG_RESULT([no])
EPM=NO
+ PKGFORMAT=native
fi
AC_SUBST(EPM)
+AC_SUBST(PKGFORMAT)
dnl ===================================================================
dnl Check for gperf
---8<---
as proposed in #desc7. It does not affect --disable-epm builds (which still
only report "No EPM: do no packaging at this stage", I just checked that), while
it has the advantage that for EPM!=NO behavior of
instsetoo_native/util/makefile.mk stays exactly the same (i.e., effectively
calls make_installer.pl -format native), and that it does not mis-match
.IF/.ENDIF -- your patch seems to break things when alllangiso is empty.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@installation.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@installation.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
