To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112909
------- Additional comments from inbetwee...@openoffice.org Mon Jul 5 22:56:45 +0000 2010 ------- I had found strange regina's information that Times New Roman and Arial don't have a glyph for u+0338, since my system (Windows Vista) shows a glyph for both fonts. Today, I was using a Windows XP system and *bingo!*: in WXP, these fonts really don't have the glyphs for that unicode character. Therefore the difference between my experience and regina's. This lead me to conclude that the erratic rendering doesn't exist due to the absence of a glyph, but because of something else. Am I correct? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
