To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80021
------- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 16 07:53:56 +0000
2010 -------
I dislike this patch for several reasons:
a) if we need a intrusive patch we shouldn't support system-libtextcat
b) I don't like the install of the fingerprints being #ifdef'ed with
SYSTEM_LIBTEXTCAT, too. This disallows usage of internal libtextcat but
system-patterns (assuming they are converted to UTF8 and the same). Which is
what I do right now in Debian:
ifeq "$(USE_SYSTEM_TEXTCAT_DATA)" "y"
# remove duplicated textcat data and replace with symlinks
cd $(PKGDIR)-common/$(OOBASISDIR)/share && \
for i in `fdupes -n -f -1 fingerprint/ /usr/share/libtextcat/LM`; do \
ln -sf /usr/share/libtextcat/LM/`basename $$i`
fingerprint/`basename $$i`; \
done
endif
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@porting.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@porting.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
