To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113185
User mst changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |FIXED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target milestone|--- |OOo 3.4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 20 17:00:23 +0000
2010 -------
after some digging around i think that the bExtra variable is an optimization to
prevent calling an expensive update function.
thus the conditional is indeed buggy, and the second fix is the right one.
i've added a bit of comment for future maintainers.
fixed in cws sw34bf01
http://hg.services.openoffice.org/hg/cws/sw34bf01/rev/f5a2e2bba058
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
