To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113731
------- Additional comments from pja...@openoffice.org Mon Aug 9 05:26:43 +0000 2010 ------- This is not new and probably very old one. I "fixed" this by - int nPrevClusterGlyph = (bRtl)? mvGlyphs.size() : -1; + int nPrevClusterGlyph = -1; + + if (bRtl) + nPrevClusterGlyph = mvGlyphs.size(); + Probably bug in gcc version 4.0.2 20050901 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux). --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org