To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113604
User hdu changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Ever confirmed| |1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |STARTED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target milestone|--- |OOo 3.4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Mon Aug 9 07:35:34 +0000
2010 -------
Indeed, thanks for testing and the suggested patch! An alternative could be to
zero the counter during
initialization... not doing it in the first place saved a bit when it was
originally introduced but now with the
maps being used so extensively a cleaner approach would be better.
A lot of scenarios need to be very carefully tested and reviewed for any
changes in these areas though,
since a refcount underflow would result in much worse problems than a few
leaked bytes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@gsl.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@gsl.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
