To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113743





------- Additional comments from i...@openoffice.org Tue Aug 10 15:05:44 +0000 
2010 -------
@zhangjfibm, first thanks for providing a second patch!
There are a few issues. The patch does not compile out of the box in the OOo
environment with warning==errors because of 'unused parameter' warning for
parameter xListener and a 'signed/unsigned mismatch' warning within the for-loop
with a sal_Int32 index variable  for a vector. The second can be avoided by
using an iterator instead. I also would shorten the namespaces within the c++ 
files.
Having done that changes the patch does fix the obvious memory leak. When the
attached example document is opened the DataPoint constructor is reached 18
times and when the document is closed the destructor is reached 18 times too
now! Thats good.
I will check next week whether there are some not so obvious scenarios where the
leak still exist - e.g. removing a series via dialog or API.
Thanks again for the patch and for pointing out the problem!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@graphics.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@graphics.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to