To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112652





------- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Tue Aug 24 09:51:46 +0000 
2010 -------
My 2 cents: don't work around in upper layers, change the underlying code 
instead.

Change rtl::math::stringToDouble() to recognize both, the 1.#* and NaN/INF 
notation.

Find out where rtl::math::doubleToString() is used to write NANs and INFs, Chart
could be a candidate for this. If this is not used in code that writes
persistent document files, change it to write the the XMLSchema-2 NaN/INF values
instead. If it is used for persistent documents, judge the impact of the change
if an older version would encounter the new NaN/INF values. I'd still opt for a
change though to get this right.

Btw, the 1.#* notation came from the MSC representation from times where
XMLSchema didn't even exist.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to