To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77068
------- Additional comments from n...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 1 19:07:22 +0000 2010 ------- ow...@openoffice.org writes: > @njsg : >> I think the problem is GhostScript being *slow*. > I remember comparing the same EPS image, included in an OO document and > displayed directly from gv. Opening with gv was instantaneous while opening in > OO was slower. However this was a few years ago. You're right, I remember gv taking more time than xpdf to render the same (PDF) document (but of course, PDF is not PS, there is no reason for poppler to do the same ghostscript does), but it is not much slow. Maybe the last time I tried this was on a way slower computer! But, indeed, convert takes longer than this, maybe ghostscript is slow when it's about rasterizing? > @grrrats : > My EPS images often describe experimental setups or device structure. Even if > not very complicated, the scrolling is hampered (especially if the images are > included as links) My last nightmare was including a LaTeX report as attachment - as I had to use the same headers and footers, I decided to add each page as a separate EPS image (so that I could generate a high quality PostScript version of the final document). It was slow, and opening the LaTeX document in gv is fast. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
