To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115180
------- Additional comments from sie...@openoffice.org Sat Oct 23 23:10:19 +0000 2010 ------- Maybe helpful for a proper solution in OpenOffice: Please read and pay attention to what Apple tells in its recent Release Notes to this recent Java Update: Apple Developer: Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 3 and 10.5 Update 8 Release Notes http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#releasenotes/Java/JavaSnowLeopardUpdate3LeopardUpdate8RN/Introduction/Introduction.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40010380-CH1-SW1 Section "New and Noteworthy" Subsection "Third Party JVM Support and Locations" Subsubsection "Java SE 6 Locations" http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/releasenotes/Java/JavaSnowLeopardUpdate3LeopardUpdate8RN/NewandNoteworthy/NewandNoteworthy.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40010380-CH4-DontLinkElementID_4 <cite> The location of the Java SE 6 runtime home has changed to /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Home. JDK bundles provided via the Developer package, developer previews, and 3rd party JVMs should be installed in /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines or ~/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines. Developer previews of Java can now be installed and uninstalled without affecting the system JVM(s). </cite> and Subsubsection "Java IDEs" http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/releasenotes/Java/JavaSnowLeopardUpdate3LeopardUpdate8RN/NewandNoteworthy/NewandNoteworthy.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40010380-CH4-DontLinkElementID_5 <cite> In testing, some Java IDEs have shown problems navigating into the new JDK bundle structure, and persisting the location of the new JDK bundles. Some IDEs may have to change how they prompt users to locate a JVM on Mac OS X, and should ideally present a list of JVMs generated from /usr/libexec/java_home --xml, which outputs each discovered JVM, and orders them according to the user's order in Java Preferences. </cite> Also pay attention to the following comment to this issue (and such proposed workaround like simply symlinking the JVM location) by one core developer of NeoOffice, where this issue is also discussed but an non-issue, because NeoOffice seems to detect the Java JVM another way (maybe the official-and-recommended-by-Apple way?) than OpenOffice: http://trinity.neooffice.org/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=60996#60996 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
