To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47609
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 2 06:36:34 -0700 2005 ------- WHat is strange about this behaviour is that m94 does not exhibit the same cpu hunger. Yes I agree that compression does affect things; however, m94 only consumes cpu cycles during the save and not afterward. m97 is slightly better but still consumes more cpu at idle than m94. To me this is a regression that should be addressed and don't you agree? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
