To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115551
------- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 12 12:49:57 +0000 2010 ------- Thanks for the investigations. However, this leaves quite some of questions: - is checking the transformation for identity really feasible? Are there no "real-life" cases where the transformation is the identity, e.g. in other applications? I'd not have a good feeling with this. - Why does it work in OOo 3.2.0 and OOo 3.2.1? The OOO320 code line was split from m60, where the bug already exists. Somewhere on the way to OOo 3.2.0 it was fixed, unintentionally. - Why does changing the anchor type make the problem vanish? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
