To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20857
------- Additional comments from grumm...@openoffice.org Mon Nov 29 20:56:54 +0000 2010 ------- I'm not sure why R1C1 notation would be referred to as "old" or "older". If anything, A1 notation is the legacy - a relic from the days of Lotus-1-2-3 and Supercalc. I have voted for issue 72191. In a way that issue is slightly misleading as it presents this as a compatibility issue with Excel, which it is not. This is about getting OOo to be taken seriously by power users, a significant proportion of which actually use R1C1 (in Excel) because it makes sense even though that program does a good job of hiding the feature away. OOo can do better at promoting the feature I'm sure. It's not clear the dependency on 72191, some developer comment on this issue would be interesting to follow. Ok, rant over. ;) and thanks to all the developers for their hard work. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
