To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=37109
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 3 02:44:54 -0700
2005 -------
I did some additional tests a few minutes ago, and it here's what I did:
Tahoma - Bold - "SÃkt "{Date field} -> Error
Tahoma - Bold - "SÃkt 2005-05-03" -> OK
Tahoma - Norm - "SÃkt "{Date field} -> Error
Arial - Bold - "SÃkt "{Date field} -> OK
Times New Roman - Bold - "SÃkt "{Date field} -> OK
So it seems like the combination of Tahoma and using the date (variable) field
fails, at least in Windows 98.
When changing font only, everything worked fine, just like when only replacing
the date field with plain text.
Hope this helps. At least it helped me, since the use of the Tahoma font is not
very important to me. I switched to Arial and now it works fine for me.
But it really should work for ALL fonts, shouldn't it..? ;)
By the way, I just read my first post in this issue and there I said that I was
running 1.1.2. The tests I did today was with 1.1.4 which I have used for a
long
time now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
