To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115902
User mav changed the following: What |Old value |New value ================================================================================ Summary|Let SfxObjectShell and Sfx|Review the usage of SfxObj |BaseModel have the same re|ectShellRef and SfxObjectS |fcounter. |hellLock. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Mon Jan 3 11:52:40 +0000 2011 ------- Actually the designed behavior of the model and SfxObjectShell is so different, that it does not look to be possible to introduce the same refcounting for the both objects. The model should be explicitly closed if it was provided to outside, if not, SfxObjectShell should allow to be closed by refcount. Thus the existing SfxObjectShellRef and SfxObjectShellLock are absolutely reasonable. If the model it provided outside of the SfxObjectShell, SfxObjectShellRef should be used, since SfxObjectShell does not control the lifetime of the document anymore. Otherwise SfxObjectShellLock should be used while the SfxObjectShell controls the document lifetime. So the task was actually to review the usage of SfxObjectShellRef/SfxObjectShellLock in the applications. Adjusting the Summary accordingly. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org