To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116543
------- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Thu Feb 3 13:01:17 +0000 2011 ------- In fact, 1.0.1 seems to have been linked against a cppuhelper library versioned with UDK_3.6, where the one in OOo 3.2.1 has version UDK_3.5 only. Not sure what to do best here: We need a extension version which has a "min-version"-dependency of OOo 3.3. However, naming this extension version 1.0.1 too would not be good - it would cause confusion. Naming it with any other name would also be bad, as it wouldn't solve the problem for those upgrading from 1.0.0 to 1.0.1. Need to discuss this ... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
