To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48783
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 9 23:40:08 -0700 2005 ------- I hope you don't mind if I comment as well ;-). I currently have two points: 1. I don't think it is good to use a hardcoded version "2.0" and I would like to see this discussed together with #i48256#, so that we come to a single approach. I personally don't care whether it is "OpenOffice.org 2" or "OpenOffice.org 2.0" or "OpenOffice.org 1.9", but I think to be able to differenciate release "2" items for 1.x item should be possible. 2. Is there a specific need why the menu file is created in the postinstall script and not packaged as every other file ? I you don't want to fight the makefile.mk stuff, the creation of this file could be done in a build/install section of the spec file .. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
