To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49370
User mav changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Assigned to|mav |fs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 03:35:47 -0700
2005 -------
mav->fs: Yes, it looks like the handling of the .uno:CloseFrame in the embedded
object interceptor misses partial "suspend" call, that should do the same as the
usual suspend call except storing of the document ( no UI should appear probably
). But the "suspend" call iself is not acceptable here just because it asks user
whether the documen should be stored, and according to the embedding API design
this decision is made by the container ( although the container itself can ask
user ). Thus for the PP1 the "suspend" call should be called by the container
interceptor.
I have submitted myself the issue 50478, to design and implement the missing
functionality in the Container so that it can be used in the .uno:CloseFrame
handling. I am still not sure how should the changes in a data linked by
embedded object ( actually in this case the data that should be stored in the
database can also be treated as a linked data ) be handled.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
