To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4219
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 8 13:10:24 -0700 2005 ------- AW: Thank you for the explanation. I wish more of the big issues would receive clear explanations like this one. Question: Hypothetically, what would be the chances of hitting a problem if the limit was increased to 1 km x 1 km? or 100 m x 100 m? I realize that no matter what you pick, someone, somewhere, will want it bigger. But it makes sense to pick a number that is "pretty safe" and still is good enough for "almost everyone". I can easily see people needing something bigger than 2m x 2m (a large banner, an architectural drawing or a building). The only man-made object I know of that is bigger than 1km are pipelines and electricity grids. So, we can accept that we won't support drawing pipelines until OOoLater but we could support buildings and large banners in the near future. In your opinion, what would be a reasonable size that is still "safe"? Cheers, Daniel. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]