To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 5 03:34:51 -0700 2005 ------- The developers are perfectly capable of postponing issues marked as bugs, so I don't think that changing this designation will help. I agree that it's an urgently needed improvement. I agree that the specification is pretty much useless. But as a QA volunteer I know I can do nothing to persuade developers to take up issues just because I think they are urgent. Classifying things correctly by the rules does help a little. If MS Office does this the right and sensible way, I will add a keyword for office interoperability, which does seem to get management attention. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
