To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40727
User pl changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|oooqa, regression |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 9 06:11:29 -0700
2005 -------
1. the diff of the produced PDF files shows nothing at all that could influence
the font rendering, obviously all the same fonts are used.
2. the output looks of the "good" 1.1.2 and "bad" 1.9.71 file look exactly the
same in ghostview, gv and kghostscript.
This leads to the conclusion, that there is something amiss outside the PDF
files themselves. I suspect that your viewers use different ghostscript
installations and/or font paths than they did when you used 1.1.2.
I don't think we can do anything here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
