To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51501
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 20 13:32:13 -0700 2005 ------- May i suggest the first priority is to switch to Version 4. Regardless of the internal usage, Openoffice is exposing a Version 1 UUID, and this must be stopped. If there is internal code using the timestamp, then "hopefully" it will realize the version variants, and will handle version 4 gracefully. Even if you break internal code, you'd be forced to ask yourself "why is it using UUID?" If you're after the timestamp, why not simply develop a timestamp mechanism? Version 1 has privacy issues, and it is always suspicious when software uses version 1. It would be nice to say OO doesn't. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
