To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7998
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 4 22:41:01 -0700 2005 ------- enmane: I have some sympathy with what you say. In a recent discussion on the user forums there was a wide consensus that the graphing module badly lets down the suite. Ther eare big problems with graphical editing too because too many "modes" of selection with different functions are available. After all, by the 21st Century there is no shortage of past products to act as "prototypes" for an improved experience. I do not know that I would have used such colourful language. It is never good to alienate ones friends. But I do think that there is an issue of culture here, and perhaps it is a model for the general decline of Sun in the hardware and customer base as well. If I were in corporate control I think that I would want to re-establish the focus on users rather than developers. But the malaise is also in the marketing and specification. Between 1.0 and 2.0 we have seen the rise of the "me too" style of marketing, trying ever harder to emulate a competing product. There is no attempt to go beyond what the market already has and create a new impetus to switch because of innovation. So, SUn, here is a metaphor for your whole operation. Remember the slogan: Innovate or die! --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
