Abramo Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This would not imply a "major" rewrite: the API and the kernel code has
> been thought for that.
> You need simply to have different snd_pcm_tick_set functions (see
> pcm_lib.c).
That's interesting. So you think that that would be the prefered way
to do low latency I/O with alsa?
./latency says:
Tip #1 (useable latency with large periods, non-blocking mode, good CPU usage,
superb xrun prevention):
latency -m 8192 -M 8192 -t 1 -p
I am correct if I think that these numbers (8192) could be a lot lower
using the RTC for polling?
Anyway, off to home know, let's see what cvs update gives me tomorrow ;-)
Maarten
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
