Paul Davis wrote: > > >Are you serious about xml? Do you have smoked something weird? > > xml was just an example. i happen to like it, because there are > standard parsers, and standard presentation tools. but i wasn't > seriously suggesting it as an alternative. i would just feel more > comfortable with a language that wasn't invented here. > > >A sensible alternative was something Lisp like, but I've preferred to > >have something more user friendly. > > you really think that the syntax enumerated in the docs and the source > and the system-wide file is more user friendly than lisp?
Notwithstanding I love Lisp so much, I have to say "Yes, definitely" ;-) -- Abramo Bagnara mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Opera Unica Phone: +39.546.656023 Via Emilia Interna, 140 48014 Castel Bolognese (RA) - Italy ALSA project http://www.alsa-project.org It sounds good! _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
