On Wed, 21 Aug 2002 12:43:53 -0700 (PDT) Guilhem Tardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Is this a common occurence that rc3 doesn't compile? > In my case, there are all sorts of isa-pnp related functions that have already > been defined. Note that I did NOT turn isa-pnp ON (the INSTALL files implies > default is OFF). > > Regards, > Guilhem. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Adam Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: alsa-user ML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Alsa-user] Re: driver 0.5.12a fails compile with arch=i486 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 06:17:00 +0100 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Z'ha'dum Asteroid Mining Corp X-Mailer: YAM 2.3 [040] AmigaOS E-Mail Client (c) 1995-2000 by Marcel Beck http://www.yam.ch/ On 18-Aug-02, Tom Whiting wrote: > On Sunday 18 August 2002 05:24 pm, Frans Ketelaars wrote: >> *** N.B. The 0.5.x series is considered deprecated and is no longer >> supported by ALSA developers *** > Sadly, the Release Candidates don't even compile on all machines I think Takashi's already spotted this issue: > looks like a wrong file came into rc3 tarball accidentally. > for compiling rc3 alsa-driver, please remove the file > > alsa-driver-0.9.0rc3/include/linux/isapnp.h > > before running configure script. Personally I'd suggest that a compile failure merits updating the tarballs on the front page - 0.9.0rc3a or something like that - because compilation failures are guaranteed to put people off ALSA for good. -- Adam Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED])(http://www.yggdrasl.demon.co.uk/) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- HTH, -Frans ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
