On Friday 25 October 2002 16:16, Kevin Conder wrote: > Abramo Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Documentation has not been written for lack of funding and lack of > >volunteers.
Maybe Abramo meant "funded volunteers" ? Maybe not, but then with one short response like that it's a bit hard to tell. > As a frustrated former documentation volunteer, here is my advice: I, and I'm sure a _lot_ of other people, are just as frustrated as hell with the state of ALSA. It's Ok for those with the time and dedication to dig deep and hard but for the "rest of us" it's generally been a right royal pain dealing with ALSA. Two points to consider: I set up that Wiki from similar levels of frustration with the lack of documentation and you are more than welcome to leave ANY input on that server... also, I feel, one of the main obsticles holding back even wider adoption of ALSA is the lack of not only documentation (Patrick Shirkey has done a great job of plugging holes) but the difficulty of the non-English speaking core developers struggling to relate to the rest of us via these lists. It's almost a non-event beyond purely tech/code issues. Jaraslov, Abramo and Takashi... you guys pump bigtime at keeping the codebase and ALSA rolling along but there is a distinct lack of leadership and direction... most likely because of the language barriers, I presume. I am not slagging on you 3 guys and I do not know what the right answers are but I can see that no one in any leadership capacity is actively outlining any coordination and direction "for the rest of us". --markc ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
