Hi,
On Sat, 29 May 2004 12:52:15 +0200 (CEST) Tim Goetze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Remi Bernhard] > >I read a lot a great thing about the audiophile 24/96 on the net, and > >i decided to buy it to get better latency than my old sblive! I just > >received the audiophile 24/96 and unfortunatly, i have a lot of XRuns > >with when i run jackd. > > obvious question, is your kernel ll-patched? if not, go here: > > http://www.zipworld.com.au/~akpm/linux/schedlat.html As i said , <rb> Sofware : Debian/Testing Kernel 2.6.5 </rb> So i have 2.6.5 kernel, and not 2.4.x. Do you think i should install 2.4.25 instead ? > > (i gather that 2.4 is still the better choice for low-latency > operations.) > I read the alsa-* archives, and i saw a thread with two people who had good latency results with 2.6.x. Could someone tell me if man can achieve a buffer size <=128 with audiophile 2496 and kernel 2.6.x ? > oh, btw, the ISA 'Blaster AWE64 i used to run in the old board did > 64/44.1 just as stable as the audiophile. Great ! Regards, Remi. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
