On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 01:44:03PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 06:11:25PM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > ones in "/usr/include/alsa" are installed by alsa-lib? Could I be > > getting the wrong "asoundef.h", or is that a red herring? > > not sure. is it possible you have 2 versions of alsa installed by > accident?
Unlikely. I did start with 0.5.x, but I made a pretty thorough job of ensuring that all traces of it were removed when I upgraded to 0.9.0 . There are only two files installed on my system called "asoundef.h" and they are both definitely from 0.9.0 : they are identical to the corresponding files in alsa-driver and alsa-lib, and their timestamps update when I run "make install" in those source trees. So if I am getting the wrong "asoundef.h" it's not due to a version clash, my 0.9.0 installation must be broken. I'm still confused as to why ALSA installs two different "asoundef.h" files in different include trees. I will carry on investigating. Cheers, Jeremy Henty ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
