On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Lee Revell wrote: > On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 22:16 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > One doubt, though - setting SCHED_FIFO and raising the priority > > doesn't do > > mlock, can that be a problem? I do have 512MB RAM... No, after getting > > a > > couple of those overruns swap use is still 0. > > Forget about SCHED_FIFO and mlock for now - what you are trying to do > should just work without the RT kernel or any special scheduling. 1s > overruns are insane - that basically renders the box useless. Something > is severely broken.
One more thing comes to mind. Lee, you would remember - there were some reports of "time ls" taking variable time under 2.6.15, unlike "time ls | cat" on LKML... Didn't read it too attentively then - was it a principle problem of 2.6.15 or only specific PCs? In any case, mine has it too. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
