On 05/12/2014 10:15 AM, Masaru Nomiya wrote: > Daniel Mack <dan...@zonque.org> has written:
>> Yes. If the quirk doesn't work for you, the device needs some other >> workaround than the UD-H01. > > Is this not related? > > [...] > if (unlikely(sender->udh01_fb_quirk)) { It is related, but the code relies on the boolean variable sender->udh01_fb_quirk which should be set for you device by the patch I sent you. You could add this line inside this if-condition: printk(KERN_ERR "%s():%d\n", __func__, __LINE__); After recompilation and reboot, the log should contain lots of messages if the quirk was set. > [...] > > But I can't get the feedback value. What exactly do you mean by that? Which tests did you do in order to find out? Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list Alsa-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user