Rich, all,

This is a comment about section 9.6.3. Protocol Extension:
'Location-Only' Peer Selection in draft-ietf-alto-protocol-05:

I think this proposed extension is problematic, as we would have to
define what an ISP is, and "same ISP is good" is not true in all
scenarios.

Furthermore, I think we don't need additional protocol mechanisms
for implementing your idea: Just use the "relative operator's
preference" rating criterion (see ALTO reqs, ARv05-16). Configure
the ALTO server to answer with "1" for IP addresses / PIDs inside
the ISP and with "0" otherwise. Technically, this is the same
as your approach, but it does not introduce new mechanisms and it
avoids having to define what an ISP is.

Comments?

Thanks,
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to