Ben, Jan, Nabil, Grant, Richard, Richard, Reinaldo,

thinking more about it, I believe the requirements will have to be put
into a separate draft, for clarity.

I agree with Jan about the duplication of text between alto-cdn and your
draft so we should merge. Therefore, I'd propose the following plan:

Co-authors of alto-cdn and jenkins draft meet and propose a unified
use cases description draft. At this stage most of the work will be just
editorial (cut/paste) as we clearly agree on the content (i.e.: use case
description).

It would be good to come reasonably soon with a proposal to the WG.

How does it sound ?

s.


On Apr 28, 2011, at 8:27 PM, Ben Niven-Jenkins wrote:

Jan, Stefano, Colleagues,

On 28 Apr 2011, at 16:30, Jan Medved wrote:
On 4/28/11 2:58 AM, "stefano previdi" <[email protected]> wrote:
splitting the current alto-cdn document makes sense to me and we
need to define:
a. use cases
b. requirements
c. proposed solutions

This seems to be most logical split.


Agreed.


your draft addresses the use cases and you may want to merge the
use cases sections we currently have in the alto-cdn draft so to
focus that one only on the proposed solution(s).

The first two uses cases in draft-jenkins-cdn-use-cases are described in
draft-penno-alto-cdn. Agreed that the text from draft-penno-alto-cdn
should be merged into the appropriate sections of
draft-jenkins-cdn-use-cases.

I'm OK with that. When I read draft-penno-alto-cdn I found it hard to extract text that is pure use case though but if you could provide text or pointers to sections I'm happy to start discussing how we could merge the use case text in draft-penno-alto-cdn with that in draft-jenkins-alto-cdn-use-cases.

The question is about requirements: do we want to include them
in one of the two drafts or into a separate document ?

My opinion is that the requirements should be documented separately to the solutions. I don't currently have a strong opinion about whether they should be documented in draft-jenkins-alto-cdn-use- cases or a separate draft.

Ben


_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to