Fine with me! Although I'd go one small step farther and say that if an entry has media-type alto-costmap+json, then it must not have an "accepts" entry. Similarly, a resource with media-type alto-networkmap+json cannot have "accepts".
Note that a server can provide full and filtered cost map services with the same uri, via GET and POST respectively. The IRD just needs two different entries, with the same uri but different media-types. Nothing says uris must be unique. - Wendy Roome From: "Y. Richard Yang" <y...@cs.yale.edu> Date: Wed, July 24, 2013 10:12 Subject: Re: [alto] Cost-type names Hi Wendy, So, the rule is: If media-type is alto-costmap+json, and no accepts (I.e., unfiltered map), then the cost-type-names in its capabilities can include only one entry. I believe that this is what you propose. If others do not see problems, we say that we reach consensus. Richard
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
