Haibin, all, I would not focus too much on the time slots during meetings. The primary method for our work should be mailing list discussions.
The meetings should serve "only" as high-bandwidth/low-latency continuations of such discussions, in order to resolve controversial issues quickly. Agenda during meetings should be given with highest priority to those documents that have caused a lot (controversial) mailing list traffic recently (of course WG items before individual drafts). So do not only review other people's drafts just before the next meeting, but do it all year round and post your thoughts on the mailing list. This is also a way to better include the people who have budgetary or other travel restrictions and cannot make it to every meeting. Thanks Sebastian On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 06:03:33AM +0000, Songhaibin (A) wrote: > I agree. Shall we try something like, if you would like to get a slot > to present your draft, it's a must that at least you should read > another draft and send the comments to the list? :) > > Best Regards! > -Haibin > > From: alto [mailto:alto-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jan Seedorf > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 10:20 PM > To: alto@ietf.org > Subject: [alto] Please read the documents from other WG participants > > Dear all, > > I think we are seeing good progress with all chartered items, which is great, > and I am convinced there is good energy in the WG to finish all the > milestones. > > What is sometimes missing---as I mentioned in the ALTO session this week here > at IETF-93---is people (other than the authors) reading the drafts and > providing feedback to the mailing list. E.g., in order to adopt a draft as WG > item, I would like to see comments from other people on the mailing list > saying they have read the draft and what they think of it. One good example > is how Richard did it for multi-cost (see > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/RUjTEP9-iIKd2txEANZCDDOMHkg) in > order to move it forward towards WGLC. Obviously, if you read a draft and > think it is very good and you have fewer or nor comments that is also fine, > but please say so on the mailing list. Also, if you have a draft of your own > that you want to progress and receive feedback on, why not start by reading > other people's drafts and help them make progress; I am sure people will then > also return the favour and read your draft and improve it. > > As chairs, our role is to make sure that drafts being adopted as WG item have > the backing of the majority of the WG (rough consensus) and drafts entering > WGLC are ready for publication, so that we do not embarrass ourselves in > front of the IESG. > > > - Jan (with chair hat on) > > ============================================================ > Prof. Dr. Jan Seedorf > Senior Researcher > NEC Europe Ltd., NEC Laboratories Europe, Network Division Kurfuerstenanlage > 36, D-69115 Heidelberg Tel. +49 (0)6221 4342-221 > Fax: +49 (0)6221 4342-155 > e-mail: jan.seed...@neclab.eu<mailto:jan.seed...@neclab.eu> > ============================================================ > NEC Europe Ltd, Registered Office: Athene, Odyssey Business Park, West End > Road, London, HA4 6QE, GB, Registered in England 2832014 > > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > alto@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto _______________________________________________ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
