Dear Adam, Thanks for the reminder!
We have expanded ALTO in the title: ALTO Cost Calendar -> Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) Cost Calendar Richard On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 3:53 PM Adam Roach via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-16: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for addressing my comments from the previous IESG evaluation. Please > expand "ALTO" in the title. See > https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt for guidance. > > > > -- -- ===================================== | Y. Richard Yang <y...@cs.yale.edu> | | Professor of Computer Science | | http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/ | =====================================
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
