Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-17: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a returning item as initially an IPR declaration what missed to take over from the initial draft (as raised in Alvaro's discuss). Therefore we re-ran both wg last call as well as IETF last call. This version also addresses all review comments from the last IESG evaluation and hopefully should now be ready to go! Update: Latest version now also addresses the OPSDIR review from the last IETF last call. _______________________________________________ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
