Dear Vijay, all, The authors have taken a pass of the document to address the reviews. Links to the new version are below. We believe that we have addressed all of the items in the two review sets by Danny and Sanjay.
Thank you so much! Richard, ===== The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto-10 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto-10 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto-10 On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:14 AM Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurb...@gmail.com> wrote: > All: The WGLC [1] for the ALTO CDNI draft is now over. The draft received > two reviews [2,3] during the WGLC period. The authors are requested to > prepare a revision based on the reviews. The draft can move ahead once the > revision is submitted. > > [1] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/gjpYSELvH2SprFSoBCD2QbrlU00/ > [2] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/-gaZKrUBnC43RyMOeaf_MtdiLa8/ > [3] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cdni/keqftt-bvNZQZxHQBSADlJVkIg8/ > > Thanks, > > - vijay >
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
