Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-22: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work on this document, and thanks to the authors for addressing my previous DISCUSS and COMMENTs. Many thanks to Spencer Dawkins for his thoughtful review: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/BcZimefF1WXXgcmg0qjc3P__EGg/ , and to Alexey Melnikov for his media-types review. I keep the only COMMENT left in v-22. Francesca 1. ----- Sections 5.1.1, 5.2.1 FP: As it is defined now, all Private Use type identifiers are not valid, because they contain ":". I understand the intention, but it would be good to clarify in the text. _______________________________________________ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
