Hi Jensen, Thanks for laying out the options!
Nir, Do you have any thoughts on Jensen's suggestion? thanx! -- Kevin J. Ma On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 8:47 PM Jensen Zhang <jingxuan.n.zh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Thanks for the information about the new CDNI footprint types. > > RFC 9241 is going to be published soon. To leverage Sec 6 of RFC 9241 [1], > the new footprint type should be added to the ALTO Entity Domain Types > registry. > > [1] > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9241.html#name-query-footprint-properties- > > In the recent ALTO WG weekly meeting, we had some brief discussion on how > to proceed. There are two options: > > 1. Add a new section/subsection in > draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types to register the new footprint > type "subdivisioncode" to the ALTO Entity Domain Types registry. > 2. Submit a new document to ALTO WG later to update the ALTO Entity Domain > Types registry. > > Personally, I will suggest the second option. It will keep the current > document clean and not interrupt the IETF process. > > I cc'ed ALTO mailing list to see if we have any other feedback from other > ALTO experts. > > Best, > Jensen > > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 10:59 PM Kevin Ma <kevin.j.ma.i...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Jensen/Jan, >> >> With the ALTO CDNI draft to be published shortly, one question came up >> wrt the adding of new footprint types to CDNI: should the ALTO Entity >> Domain Types registry also be updated? In the case of >> draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types, should subdivisioncode be added >> to the ALTO Entity Domain Types registry? >> >> thanx! >> >> -- Kevin J. MA >> >> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 12:52 AM Kevin Ma <kevin.j.ma.i...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> As we discussed in the session at IETF 113, the footprint extension >>> draft (draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types) is pretty >>> straightforward and registers two useful new footprint types. There were >>> no objections to moving to WGLC in the session, though Benson Muite did >>> mention a potential concern about ISO3166 codes. This is the official >>> working group last call. If you have any comments, questions, or concerns >>> please respond to this thread. >>> >>> The latest version of the draft can be found here: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types/ >>> >>> This WGLC will stay open for two weeks and close on May 26, 2022. If no >>> objections or major issues are raised in that time, we will move to submit >>> the draft to the IESG. >>> >>> thanx! >>> >>> -- Kevin and Sanjay >>> >>
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto