I've got a 2.4.2 amanda server using samba to backup the C:\ drive
of an NT workstation.  That user's machine has C:\ set as one 8gig
partition, and it's 6gig full.  My tapes have just over 4 gig 
capacity compressed.  (Of course there are many other partitions in this
backup set, but those aren't the problem.)

Amanda pulls the data from the NT disk, and writes it to 5 gigs
worth of compressed disk, in 6 chunks.  Now, the compressed sum
of all these sections is already well beyond what the tapetype
says my tape can handle.

So, why is amanda even trying to write 5 gigs worth to a tape it
knows can only hold 4 gig?  Isn't it checking?
  
It keeps running into EOT (like, duh) and it reschedules the same
machine the next day.  I've looked at the past week's backups and
all I have is one or two very small incrementals, and repeated failed
attempt to backup this same NT box.

I thought the planner was supposed to be more intelligent than this?

Here's the line for this disk from the amstatus report:

joi://janet/c$        0 5619328k writing to tape (18:04:52)

Here's the end of the dump log:

  | tar: dumped 55234 files and directories
  | Total bytes written: 6937226240
  sendbackup: size 6774635
  sendbackup: end
INFO taper tape DailySet201 kb 4824992 fm 3 writing file: No space
left on device
FAIL taper joi //janet/c$ 0 [out of tape]
ERROR taper no-tape [[writing file: No space left on device]]

And here's the tapetype:

define tapetype EXABYTE-Eliant-820 {
    comment "EXABYTE-Eliant-820 ( EXB-85058HE-0000 Rev 01 ), 120m
tape, Adaptec AIC-7860 Ultra SCSI host adapter"
    length 4403 mbytes
    filemark 102 kbytes
    speed 909 kbytes
    lbl-templ "/usr/local/etc/amanda/DailySet2/EXB-8500.ps"
}

Here's the schedule:
GENERATING SCHEDULE:
--------
joi //janet/c$ 11344 0 1970:1:1:0:0:0 3445388 114846
joi //treacy/c2$ 11344 0 1970:1:1:0:0:0 849557 28318
joi //mheitkamp/backupd$ 11343 0 1970:1:1:0:0:0 0 0

Why is amanda blowing the tape size by 25%?  Why is it being
stubborn about doing this disk, a low-priority user workstation,
instead of doing the medium and high-priority file servers?

-- 
Joi Ellis                    Software Engineer
Aravox Technologies          [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

No matter what we think of Linux versus FreeBSD, etc., the one thing I
really like about Linux is that it has Microsoft worried.  Anything
that kicks a monopoly in the pants has got to be good for something.
           - Chris Johnson

Reply via email to