In a message dated: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:42:13 BST Anthony Worrall said: >One reason would be the NFS server has a 1Gb interface and the clients and >tape server have only 100Mb. Okay, so now you're saturating the 100Mb interface on the tape server twice? I still don't see the advantage in this. -- Seeya, Paul ---- It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing, but I'm really actively waiting for all my problems to go away. If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!
- NFS mounted holding disk Jim Harmon
- Re: NFS mounted holding disk John R. Jackson
- Re: NFS mounted holding disk Anthony Worrall
- Re: NFS mounted holding disk Paul Lussier
- Re: NFS mounted holding disk John R. Jackson
- Re: NFS mounted holding disk Johannes Niess
- Re: NFS mounted holding disk Anthony Worrall
- RE: NFS mounted holding disk Bort, Paul
- RE: NFS mounted holding disk Anthony Worrall