On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:53:08PM -0500, John R. Jackson wrote:
> I'm not sure what this has to do with "Readline" as in your Subject:,
> but be that as it may.
Oopps... that was my original question, but I solved the problem with
(readline -> amrecover history functionality) on my own. For some reason
it took several tries to convince amanda configure to recognize the
library although it is was cached by ld.
> I'm sure cranking up tapebufs makes a big difference on some systems.
> I thought I'd give it a try when it was added and ran some tests here.
> Anything above the default *lowered* my throughput. I'm sure if I dug
> into it long enough I'd find some contention going on that explains this.
This is a good thing to know, thanks.
> The nice thing about this parameter is that you can't screw up. The worst
> that will happen is Amanda runs a little slower. It won't do any damage
> to the images being written.
I'll run some experiments and will share my experience, if I figure out
something that might benefit others. Anyway, thanks a lot for the useful
advice.
Regards,
Lari Huttunen
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
| Lari Huttunen | +358 50 338 0759 | http://www.helsinki.fi/~lshuttun |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
