>... However I'm running 2.4.1p2 and it seems to force the >username to 'backup'. Unless you rebuild with --with-samba-user. >I've been looking at the latest 2.4.2p2 sources, and I can't find any >place where it still might be doing this ... The user name is now part of the amandapass file. See the docs/SAMBA file. It's been updated to show the new syntax. >David John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Windows support in 2.4.2p2 vs 2.4.1p2? David E. Bernholdt
- Re: Windows support in 2.4.2p2 vs 2.4.1p2? Joshua Baker-LePain
- Re: Windows support in 2.4.2p2 vs 2.4.1p2? Olivier Nicole
- Re: Windows support in 2.4.2p2 vs 2.4.1p2? Olivier Nicole
- Re: Windows support in 2.4.2p2 vs 2.4.1p2? John R. Jackson
- Re: Windows support in 2.4.2p2 vs 2.4.1p2? Olivier Nicole